U.S. Department of Education EDFacts
Graduation rates & test scores
Graduation rates and the share of students passing state tests, by school, district and state, with ranges turned into usable numbers.
Published by U.S. Department of Education EDFacts
Finest detail facility
Tables 5
State data notes
Sample of 25 rows out of about 2,795
· 9 columns
| row_id | school_year | state | file_spec | data_group | reporting_level | data_note | state_note | source_zip |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020-2021,2019-2020,2018-2019,2017-2018,2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | ALL STATES | 150,150151 | 695,695696 | SEA | The National (United States) graduation rates are not calculated for all subgroups, including Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders, Two or More Races, Homeless, and Foster Care Students. If SEAs reported these subgroups, the data are available at the SEA-, LEA-, and School-level. | The state notes in all sections of ED Data Express reflect the views of the state only and do not necessarily reflect compliance with requirements or consistency with reporting instructions. | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 2 | 2011-2012,2010-2011 | No data | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Idaho received an approved timeline extension request, and did not report an adjusted cohort graduation rate until SY2012-13. | No data | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 3 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | ALABAMA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Alabama: The Alabama State Department of Education has indicated that their adjusted cohort graduation rate data was misstated. Please use Alabama’s adjusted cohort graduation rate data with caution. For more information, please see the following press release issued by the state: https://www.alsde.edu/sec/comm/News%20Releases/12-08-2016%20Graduation%20Rate%20Review.pdf. | No data | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 4 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | District of Columbia: The Office of the State Superintended of Education (OSSE) calculates the ACGR based on certified graduates lists that are provided by LEAs to OSSE. Each LEA is responsible for applying its graduation policies to its potential graduates when creating the certified graduates list. One of DC’s LEAs is modifying its method for applying its graduation policies, which may result in future changes to these numbers. See this report for additional information: https://osse.dc.gov/release/osse-releases-final-alvarez-marsal-report-dcps-graduation-and-attendance-outcomes | No data | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 5 | 2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | IDAHO | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Idaho received an approved timeline extension request, and did not report an adjusted cohort graduation rate until SY2013-14. | No data | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 6 | 2011-2012,2010-2011 | OKLAHOMA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Okahoma was unable to report adjusted cohort graduation rate data until SY2012-13. | Oklahoma is currently unable to calculate this cohort graduation rate. To accomplish the demands of this graduation calculation, a statewide data management system which is effectively utilized by every district in our state is necessary. To this point, such a system has not been fully operational in Oklahoma because not all districts provided and certified the needed data. We are developing a new tool through our data management system for districts to certify the retrospective data we need to complete the cohort analysis. | SY1011_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_SEA_data_files.zip |
| 8 | 2020-2021,2019-2020,2018-2019,2017-2018,2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | ALL STATES | 150,150151 | 695,695696 | LEA,SCH | At the LEA- and School-levels, the subgroups 'Asian' and 'Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders' are aggregated and reported as 'Asian/Pacific Islander'.At the LEA- and School-levels, the subgroups 'Asian' and 'Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders' are aggregated and reported as 'Asian/Pacific Islander'. | The state notes in all sections of ED Data Express reflect the views of the state only and do not necessarily reflect compliance with requirements or consistency with reporting instructions. | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 9 | 2011-2012,2010-2011 | No data | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Idaho received an approved timeline extension request, and did not report an adjusted cohort graduation rate until SY2012-13. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 10 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | ALABAMA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Alabama: The Alabama State Department of Education has indicated that their adjusted cohort graduation rate data was misstated. Please use Alabama’s adjusted cohort graduation rate data with caution. For more information, please see the following press release issued by the state: https://www.alsde.edu/sec/comm/News%20Releases/12-08-2016%20Graduation%20Rate%20Review.pdf. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 11 | 2016-2017 | ALABAMA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Alabama: Partial Data: No data were reported for Students with Disabilities (CWD), Economically Disadvantaged, English learners, and American Indian/Alaska Native (MAN) subgroups in SY2016-17. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 12 | 2017-2018 | ALASKA | 150,151 | 695,696 | LEA | The reported graduation rate (FS150) does not match the graduation rate calculated using reported counts (FS151) for 3 LEAs: 0200210, 0200480, and 0200720 . The difference between the reported and calculated rates ranges from -0.01 to -0.01%. Please use caution when using the data. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 13 | 2017-2018 | BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION | 150,151 | 695,696 | LEA | The reported graduation rate (FS150) does not match the graduation rate calculated using reported counts (FS151) for 2 LEAs: 5900145 (homeless subgroup) and 5900115 (Children with Disabilities subgroup). Please use caution when using the data. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 14 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | District of Columbia: The Office of the State Superintended of Education (OSSE) calculates the ACGR based on certified graduates lists that are provided by LEAs to OSSE. Each LEA is responsible for applying its graduation policies to its potential graduates when creating the certified graduates list. One of DC’s LEAs is modifying its method for applying its graduation policies, which may result in future changes to these numbers. See this report for additional information: https://osse.dc.gov/release/osse-releases-final-alvarez-marsal-report-dcps-graduation-and-attendance-outcomes | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 15 | 2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | IDAHO | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Idaho received an approved timeline extension request, and did not report an adjusted cohort graduation rate until SY2013-14. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 16 | 2011-2012,2010-2011 | OKLAHOMA | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Okahoma was unable to report adjusted cohort graduation rate data until SY2012-13. | Oklahoma is currently unable to calculate this cohort graduation rate. To accomplish the demands of this graduation calculation, a statewide data management system which is effectively utilized by every district in our state is necessary. To this point, such a system has not been fully operational in Oklahoma because not all districts provided and certified the needed data. We are developing a new tool through our data management system for districts to certify the retrospective data we need to complete the cohort analysis. | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 17 | 2016-2017 | UTAH | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA | Due to data quality concerns, Utah's LEA level data have been suppressed in SY2016-17. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 18 | 2013-2014 | WASHINGTON | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA,SEA | Washington submitted conflicting Asian permitted values. Upon examination, it appears as though the Asian/Pacific Islander count is an aggregation of the Asian and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander counts. Due to this potential error, the Asian/Pacific Islander data may be double the actual counts of Asian/Pacific Islander students in the adjusted-cohort graduation rate. Almost all subgroup cohort counts reported at the SEA level are significantly higher than aggregated LEA subgroup counts (5.0 to 11.7% higher). | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 19 | 2016-2017 | WYOMING | 150,150151,151 | 695,695696,696 | LEA | Due to data quality concerns, Wyoming's LEA level data have been suppressed in SY2016-17. | No data | SY1018_FS150_FS151_DG695_DG696_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 23 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | No data | 175,178,179,185,188,189 | 583,584,585,588,589,590 | LEA,SEA | The reporting period for the mathematics, reading/language arts, and science assessment data is the state-specific assessment testing window. Note that most states administer their assessments in the spring. | No data | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 24 | 2016-2017,2015-2016,2014-2015,2013-2014,2012-2013,2011-2012,2010-2011 | No data | 175,178,185,188 | 583,584,588,589 | LEA,SEA | State assessments are designed by each state to measure the content the state has determined appropriate for that grade and subject. As a result, both the content on the tests and achievement standards students must meet to be considered “proficient” vary widely across states. Proficiency rates across different states should not be considered comparable. Uses of the data to compare achievement across states could be done utilizing a school’s relation to their state mean or to a state target, but should be done with caution. For more information, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) has released a series of studies exploring state assessment comparability utilizing the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). NCES studies on NAEP and state assessments can be accessed online here: <a href="http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/statemapping/">http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/studies/statemapping/</a> Additionally, state assessments have changed significantly over time. For information on state assessment changes, see the individual state data notes. | No data | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 25 | 2015-2016 | ALABAMA | 175 | 583 | LEA,SEA | Alabama made the following changes to its regular assessments for high school between SY2014-15 and SY2015-16: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, (3) Significantly changed assessment items, and (4) Used entirely new assessment. As a result, the State's SY2015-16 results are not comparable to prior years. | No data | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 26 | 2014-2015 | ALABAMA | 175 | 583 | LEA,SEA | Alabama made the following changes to its alternate assessments for all grades between SY2013-14 and SY2014-15: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, (3) Significantly changed assessment items, and (4) Realigned assessment to new content standards. As a result, the State's SY2014-15 results are not comparable to prior years. | No data | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 27 | 2013-2014 | ALABAMA | 175 | 583 | LEA,SEA | Alabama made the following changes to its regular assessment with and without accommodations between SY2012-13 and SY2013-14: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Changed proficiency standards, (3) Changed assessment items, (4) Used new assessment, and (5) Discontinued Alabama High School Graduation Exam. As a result, the State's SY2013-14 results are not comparable to prior years. | No data | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 28 | 2016-2017 | ALASKA | 175 | 583 | LEA,SEA | Alaska made the following changes to its regular assessments for high school between SY2015-16 and SY2016-17: (1) Changed cut scores, (2) Significantly changed assessment items, and (3) Used entirely new assessment. Additionally, Alaska indicated changing its regular assessments for grades 3 through 8. As a result, the State's SY2016-17 results are not comparable to prior years. | The scale and score ranges for PEAKS are different than those used with previous summative assessments. Please note that Alaska canceled general and alternate assessment during the 2015-2016 school year. | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
| 29 | 2015-2016 | ALASKA | 175,175178179,178,185,188 | 583,583584585,584,588,589 | LEA,SEA | No data reported at the SEA, LEA, or School levels in SY2015-16. | Data for these files do not exist due to the cancellation of state assessments. | SY1018_FS175_DG583_LEA_data_files.zip |
Need the whole thing? Spreadsheet links, downloads, and AI access come with Level 3.
See pricing